UK Defense Secretary Ben Wallaceaccused the prince harry to “boast” of having killed 25 Taliban militants while serving in the British Army in Afghanistan and said there wasdisappointed” to his former colleagues.
In his memoirs, Spare (In the Shadows), Prince Harry recounts his time as an attack helicopter gunner Apache during his second mission in Afghanistan. He said that in the “age of Apaches and laptops” it was possible to establish “exactly how many enemy combatants he had killed.”
“And it seemed essential to me not to be afraid of that number. So my number is 25. It is not a number that fills me with satisfaction, but it does not embarrass me either, ”he wrote.
Harry, in the book, also admitted that he dehumanized those he killed in combat. “When I was immersed in the heat and confusion of combat I did not think of those 25 as people,” he wrote. “They were chess pieces removed from the board. Bad people taken out before he could kill good people.”
Prince Harry He served Afghanistan twice under strict secrecy so as not to be a particular target of the Taliban, who, if they knew he was on their land, could have tried to reach him, which would have meant a major risk to British troops. He finally had to go back to the Kingdom United when his presence in the Middle East became known, but he returned to combat in 2012 to camping Bastionin Helmand province, trained to fly helicopters Apache.
Ben Wallace was official of the scots guard and served in North Ireland, Germany, Cyprus and Central America during the 1990s. He also worked as an intelligence officer.
Asked by the radio station LBC about how many people he had killed during his time in the armed forces, the minister stated: “Look, I think you should ask prince harry…Frankly I think bragging about counts or talking about counts does two things: distorts the fact that the army is a team game. For an infantryman to get to the top, that person has the support of hundreds of people behind him, either at headquarters in Britain, or in the royal logistics corps, who helped him get there. It’s a team, so it’s not about who shoots more or who doesn’t shoot more,” he said.
“If you start talking about who did what, what you’re really doing is let down all those other peoplebecause you are not a better person because you did it and they didn’t,” Wallace said.
Until now, the government had avoided directly criticizing Harry for his memoirs.
Wave of criticism from veterans
The reviews of Wallace join others made by several Afghanistan veterans who said the prince had broken a “unwritten rule” by revealing the casualties produced.
retired colonel Tim Collins, who led a battalion in Iraq in 2003, said that “Harry turned on the other family, the military, who once embraced him, having torn apart his birth family.”
Others criticized the disclosure of his military record as also reckless in a public person who may become a target of extremists around the world.
Former Commander of the Royal Navy Ben McBean urged the Duke of Sussex to “shut up”.
“He already has a big target on his back and he may have grown a bit more. But he’s in America, he’s got security… here in the UK they might think we can’t get to Harry, but we could go to his old headquarters… you’re always a target anyway, but I think exacerbating things and pulling numbers doesn’t really help,” he said. McBean to local media.
For his part, retired colonel Richard kemp called Harry’s comments “ill-advised” and warned that they could have compromised their security and provoke the revenge of the terrorists. Kemp, who was sent to Kabul in 2003 to assume command of the forces in Afghanistan, told BBC: “I think you are wrong when you say in your book that the insurgents were seen as practically non-human -subhuman perhaps-, just as chess pieces that had to be knocked down.”.
“That is not the case at all. That’s not the way the British Army trains people as he claims… So I think he’s giving the wrong impression when he makes those kinds of comments – that’s not the way the British Army sees things.” , refuted kemp.
But also, kemp whipped up Harry because of the security risk that his words could mean: “Not only has he gone too far by talking about this in terms of himself, but it may have repercussions for others. As a member of the Royal Family he has to accept being a kind of ambassador to the United Kingdom, so his comments may affect the safety of his former comrades in operations abroad…”.
Even Harry’s own military instructor, michael booley, he claimed he stayed “amazed” for how the prince recounted his time in Afghanistan and said that his testimony about one of his training flights was “inaccurate”.
“I am amazed by this. even in shockhe declared.
Keep reading:
Why Prince Harry Shouldn’t Have Revealed He Killed 25 Taliban In Afghanistan
Prince Harry’s military instructor opened up about his role in the Afghan war
Source-www.infobae.com